RT speaks to an author and scholar at a major Washington think-tank Andrew Levine. He exposes the pitfalls of the American electoral system and Barack Obama’s four-year-term in the White House.
The United States has a federal government, with elected officials at the federal (national), state and local levels. On a national level, the head of state, the President, is elected indirectly by the people, through an Electoral College. In modern times, the electors virtually always vote with the popular vote of their state. All members of the federal legislature, the Congress, are directly elected. There are many elected offices at the state level, each state having at least an elective governor and legislature. There are also elected offices at the local level, in counties and cities. It is estimated that across the whole country, over one million offices are filled in every electoral cycle.
State law regulates most aspects of electoral law, including primaries, the eligibility of voters (beyond the basic constitutional definition), the running of each state’s electoral college, and the running of state and local elections. The United States Constitution defines (to a basic extent) how federal elections are held, in Article One and Article Two and various amendments. The federal government has also been involved in attempts to increase voter turnout, by measures such as the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.
The financing of elections has always been controversial, because private sources of finance make up substantial amounts of campaign contributions, especially in federal elections. Voluntary public funding for candidates willing to accept spending limits was introduced in 1974 for presidential primaries and elections. The Federal Elections Commission, created in 1975 by an amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act has the responsibility to disclose campaign finance information, to enforce the provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions, and to oversee the public funding of U.S. presidential elections.
TAGS:
GlobalCrisisNews 2012 Iran UN US Barack Obama Hope hopeless change policy failed academic war November argue Iraq Afghanistan effect united states lost losses battles wars WW3 world war presidential election electoral campaign conflict weak defeated recipe success government crazy idea dodged bullet buying off Israel arms weapons guns nuclear chemical ballistic cruise missiles instance problem supporters alternative worse benefits scary Ron Paul political solution position Milt Romney steward empire domestic politics occupy wall-street protest legalised corruption economy crisis financial farming bank mortgage energy oil gas electricity fuel power capital credit card NWO new world order democrats republican green party money dollars coke vs. Pepsi media control sales promotions products
Skeenaboy17 says
October 6, 2015 at 10:43 AMnovember 2013